Comparison

Supasaito vs AKARUMI

AKARUMI offers broad daily monitoring, crawler analysis and action management, with Editor and DeepEditor options in its current offer. Supasaito combines weekly scans, contextual campaigns and read/write MCP access under company permissions and usage limits.

Two approaches to measurement and execution. Publishing and service scope depend on access and contract.

Supasaito

  1. Business / funnel context
  2. Measure
  3. Prioritise
  4. Campaigns / reviewed tasks
  5. Publish / record URLs
  6. Measure again

and round again

Four supported AI models · weekly on paid plans · execution by people / connected agents

AKARUMI

  1. Track daily
  2. Analyse crawlers / answers
  3. Manage actions
  4. Monitor changes

and round again

Daily tracking · crawler logs · quote-based plans

Feature by feature

Compare the documented differences, then read the scope and plan limits in each product’s card. For incomplete evidence, each product has its own availability indicator.

What this means

Availability is shown separately for each product when equivalent scope cannot be established. A full bar means the stated capability is available; a striped bar means limited or different scope. An empty dashed bar means documentation is insufficient. These indicators are not quality scores.

Business context

Business, market and funnel information used to guide the work.

Business context

What this means

Company, audience, market and sales-path information used to guide work.

Equivalent scope is not established; the cards distinguish documented capabilities from questions to verify.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Editable business, market, visual-style and funnel documents provide shared context for campaign briefs and reviews.
  • Revision history preserves the context used for submitted work; funnels describe sales paths, not lead or conversion tracking.

AKARUMI

  • The reviewed AKARUMI sources do not establish equivalent scope for this criterion.
  • This is an evidence gap, not a claim that the capability is absent; confirm the workflow and plan terms.

Measuring AI presence

Which AI systems are observed, how often, by what method and with what history.

AI surfaces covered

What this means

The AI assistants and search surfaces included in the measured set.

AKARUMI documents more AI surfaces, including Perplexity, Copilot and AI Mode, which Supasaito does not measure.

Supasaito

AKARUMI is stronger here

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Google AI Overviews.
  • Free measures two fixed AI models once; Starter chooses three and Business uses all four.

AKARUMI

  • Documents broader monitoring than Supasaito, including Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Mode.
  • Engine availability depends on the current offer.

How often it measures

What this means

How often a new measurement is collected.

AKARUMI offers daily tracking; Supasaito’s paid scans are weekly. Free access has different limits.

Supasaito

AKARUMI is stronger here

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • Paid plans measure weekly.
  • Free is an initial snapshot.
  • History begins with your own measurements; a changed question set is marked.

AKARUMI

  • Advertises daily monitoring.
  • Supasaito's paid scans are weekly, so AKARUMI is the more frequent tracker here.

Historical depth

What this means

How far back results go, including data from before signup.

Equivalent scope is not established; the cards distinguish documented capabilities from questions to verify.

Supasaito

Limited or different scope

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Visibility history starts at the first scan; there is no historical backfill.
  • Paid scans build a series over time. Changes to the measured question set are marked.

AKARUMI

  • An accumulated tracking series and access to data from before signup are different offers.
  • Comparable retention and pre-signup history were not established; confirm the selected plan’s historical window.

Site diagnosis and crawler signals

Checks of your pages and records of AI crawlers visiting your site.

AI crawler telemetry

What this means

Observed visits by AI bots in server or CDN logs.

AKARUMI reads AI crawler logs; Supasaito checks accessibility but does not ingest those logs.

Supasaito

AKARUMI is stronger here

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • No native ingestion of AI crawler server logs.
  • Site accessibility checks and connected Google traffic data answer different questions.

AKARUMI

  • AI crawler analysis uses access-log data, rather than inferring bot visits from analytics referrals.
  • Supasaito does not ingest those access logs.

Auditing your own site

What this means

Checks of your own pages for accessibility, content and technical issues.

Supasaito documents page scores; AKARUMI’s comparable audit scope is not established by the reviewed public offer.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Site audits score HTML readiness with SSPS and analyse page content automatically. Rendering adds SSPS+; performance is the separate PERF score.
  • Own-site crawl caps are 300 pages on Free, 1,000 on Starter and 10,000 on Business. Competitor analyses have separate quotas and page caps.

AKARUMI

  • The public feature pages focus on visibility, crawler analysis and actions.
  • Equivalent site/page audit scope is not established; confirm it with the vendor.

Page content and citation patterns

What this means

Page role, format, purpose and buyer stage, compared with observed citations and the proposed content work.

Compare documented content analysis; similarly named recommendations do not establish equivalent scope.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Classifies page role, format, purpose, buyer stage and target action. Own and competitor page inventories can be filtered by these fields.
  • Compares observed citations by page type and format, then uses that evidence to plan new content or an existing-page update. Patterns are not guarantees of future citations.

AKARUMI

  • The cited public sources do not establish an equivalent page classification and citation-to-action workflow. Confirm the scope and plan terms with the provider.

Turning findings into work

Recommendations, task assignments and rules for execution and review.

Prioritised recommendations

What this means

Recommended work and the priorities attached to it.

Both organise recommendations by status; Supasaito also supplies campaign context, assignments and separate execution/review rules.

Supasaito

Comparable — different approaches

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • Versioned recommendations turn measured gaps into actions to create content, update a suitable page or publish externally.
  • Each content action records its target, format, evidence and readiness. People or authorised agents can clarify decisions and take the work through tasks and campaigns.

AKARUMI

  • AI-proposed actions and an action table provide recommendations and status management.
  • Product announcements and current plan terms should be distinguished.

Campaigns and task coordination

What this means

How work is organised into campaigns, stages and assigned tasks.

Equivalent scope is not established; the cards distinguish documented capabilities from questions to verify.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Campaigns connect preparation, research, content placements and results through assigned tasks.
  • People and authorised connected agents use the same workflow; external work needs their own destination access.

AKARUMI

  • The reviewed AKARUMI sources do not establish equivalent scope for this criterion.
  • This is an evidence gap, not a claim that the capability is absent; confirm the workflow and plan terms.

Execution and review rules

What this means

Who may execute, approve or return work for correction.

Equivalent scope is not established; the cards distinguish documented capabilities from questions to verify.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Set executor eligibility separately from reviewer eligibility, with optional independent review and returns for correction.
  • Review policies apply to eligible preparation and content tasks. Publication submission records the URL and completes without a separate review.

AKARUMI

  • The reviewed AKARUMI sources do not establish equivalent scope for this criterion.
  • This is an evidence gap, not a claim that the capability is absent; confirm the workflow and plan terms.

Content production and distribution

Writing content and placing it on your own or external sites.

A brief a writer can use

What this means

Briefs, drafting and publishing workflows; native generation is a separate capability.

AKARUMI lists Editor options; Supasaito documents briefs and drafting instructions. AKARUMI’s full production scope needs confirmation.

Supasaito

Comparable — different approaches

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • Briefs are generated for individual content actions, with input versions and an outdated-brief notice when inputs change. External actions can have their own brief.
  • People or connected agents write and publish through their destination systems; Supasaito is not a native article generator or CMS publisher.

AKARUMI

  • The current price page lists Editor and optional DeepEditor.
  • The reviewed public pages do not establish the full drafting/publishing workflow; absence of detail is not absence of content tooling.

Observing changes after work

Recording published work and observing subsequent measurement changes.

Changes after publishing

What this means

Recording work and observing later changes; this alone does not establish causation.

Both can observe later movement. Before-and-after data alone does not prove what caused it.

Supasaito

Comparable — different approaches

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • Record published URLs and compare later mentions, citations and visibility.
  • Movement after publication is observational; it does not prove the publication caused it.

AKARUMI

  • Daily monitoring and action status tracking support following later changes.
  • They are not proof that a completed action caused the movement.

Integrations and tool access

What your tools and agents can read or change, subject to permissions.

Reading the data from your own tools

What this means

What external tools can read or change through supported connections.

Check the actual data and write operations exposed, with plan, permission and usage limits.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • MCP is included on every plan, including Free, for reading and permitted changes within company roles, connection permissions and quotas.
  • Company permissions, rate limits and usage quotas apply on every plan.
  • There is no public REST API.

AKARUMI

  • A public REST API or MCP specification was not established from the reviewed pages.
  • Confirm integration options; lack of public documentation does not prove no access exists.

Adoption and commercial terms

Languages, team access, plans, quotas and contractual requirements.

Published pricing and entry

What this means

Entry terms, subscriptions, quotas, add-ons and separately scoped services.

Supasaito publishes paid prices and offers a permanent free snapshot; AKARUMI requires a price inquiry.

Supasaito

Supasaito is stronger here

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • Free does not expire and includes the initial audit and visibility snapshot.
  • Paid plans start at ¥29,800/month for Starter and ¥148,000 for Business; Enterprise is custom.
  • Recurring scans require a paid subscription. MCP is included on every plan within its permissions and quotas; expert services are scoped separately.

AKARUMI

  • Publishes plan structures but requires an inquiry for prices.
  • Trial and optional Editor/DeepEditor terms should be confirmed before purchase.

Japanese market and language

What this means

Interface and support languages, measurement markets and data-residency terms.

Separate Japanese product support, measurement targeting and contractual data residency.

Supasaito

Comparable — different approaches

AKARUMI

Supasaito

  • A Japanese product and support, yen pricing, Tokyo database region and nine interface languages.
  • AI model and market coverage remain the four supported surfaces.

AKARUMI

  • A Japanese product from ipe with Japanese documentation and SEO/LLMO consulting.
  • Both vendors serve Japanese customers.

Languages beyond Japanese

Supasaito ships nine interface languages; AKARUMI’s measurement-language coverage needs confirmation.

Supasaito

Available

AKARUMI

Not documented in consulted sources

Supasaito

  • Nine interface languages are shipped.
  • Interface localisation and measurement language coverage are different capabilities.

AKARUMI

  • The reviewed materials are Japanese.
  • A public list of supported measurement languages was not established; Japanese materials do not prove Japanese-only measurement.

Which one is right for you

Pick Supasaito if…

  • You want business and funnel context in campaigns and reviewed tasks.
  • You want page content and competitor citation evidence connected to decisions about creating, updating and publishing content.
  • You want to see public plan prices and start with a permanent free snapshot.

Pick AKARUMI if…

  • You need AI model coverage beyond Supasaito’s four supported surfaces.
  • You need daily monitoring rather than weekly scans.
  • You need access-log crawler analysis and multiple client workspaces under the agreed plan.

How Supasaito works: the closed loop

For AI visibility, Supasaito connects measurement to contextual campaign work and later observation. GEO, LLMO and AEO are tactics within this part of the broader platform.

  1. 1. Your business, structured

    Business and market documents, buyer questions and funnel context. People and agents maintain this context; measurements and recommendations depend on it.

  2. 2. Measure what AI says

    Measure brand mentions, position, sentiment, competitors and citations across the AI models included in your plan. Free is an initial snapshot; paid plans measure weekly.

  3. 3. Get a prioritised list

    Page content and observed citations inform content actions: create, update or publish externally. Recommendations record their playbook version and use your business context.

  4. 4. Run campaigns and reviewed tasks

    People and authorised agents execute assigned tasks under separate execution and review rules. Publishing needs destination access; expert support is scoped separately.

  5. 5. Record what you published

    Record the published URL as a tracked source. Public content, site improvements and new business facts can feed the next cycle.

  6. 6. Measure again

    Paid weekly scans show later changes, with question-set changes marked. Before-and-after movement alone does not prove that a publication caused it.

Sources

Competitor information reflects the cited sources as of October 1, 2026. Check each provider for current features and pricing.

Supasaito capabilities checked:

  1. AKARUMI(アカルミ)製品サイト トップ
  2. AKARUMI:料金(プラン別の対象モデル・計測上限)
  3. AKARUMI:機能一覧
  4. AKARUMI:活用ガイド
  5. AKARUMI:お知らせ「AI施策提案機能をリリースいたしました。」(2026年8月12日)
  6. AKARUMI:お知らせ「PLAYBOOK・マニュアルページを追加いたしました。」(2026年7月9日)
  7. AKARUMI:利用規約
  8. Supasaito page content analysis
  9. Supasaito content actions